4/7 - Spring Fling: The
Morning After
A mixed bag of six
one-acts, alternating neatly between skits and actual plays or attempts at
plays, starting with the weakest of the bunch, a Little Mermaid wedding-night
sketch called Beyond The Sea by Joe Tracz, which felt like an after-midnight
Saturday Night Live sketch without the talented guest stars. Very light fare, and not very
well-acted. But if the producers wanted
to set the audience up for a sucker punch, it was perfect, because the next
piece was Mud Hole by Hilary Bettis. “She’s really fucked up,” said my
friend Ann when it was over. “Yeah,
isn’t it great?” I replied. It starts
out at an episode of Young Amish In Love before doing a hit-and-run on
everything you’re expecting, and it’s a textbook example of how to do a short
one-act right—with the entrance of each new character, the play shifts gears
and opens up into something different and, ultimately, darker. Watching it was like being embraced by Cinderella,
and when I tilted my head up for love’s true kiss, I got so professionally
mugged that my bruises looked like birthmarks.
Hello Ms. by Heidi Schreck felt like a collection of scenes
from an unfinished full-length play, or a proposal for a full-length play,
which was not as clever as it thought it was, and whose only structure was
chronological. But this play is probably
why the evening got a New York Times review, because one of the actors in it
was Annie Baker (aka this month’s Nicky Silver), playing Gloria Steinem. She certainly looked the part, and played it
with a sense of entitlement which, on the part of the actress, felt more like a
character revelation than a character choice.
I just wish the thing had a beginning, middle and end, instead of a lot
of middle. Possible approach: the final
words of the play are “We sold out,” referring to the first edition of Ms
Magazine. Me, I would have played on
those words throughout the entire piece and made it the unifying theme: selling
out. But then I always think in puns.
Coach Darling by Krista Knight was cleverly staged, well-acted
and smartly written, except for one thing.
I might have missed it, but I didn’t hear the title character’s last name
mentioned aloud once during the play, so the “Oh yeah!” moment at the end was
not as strong as it could have been. And
yeah, if I had turned on a flashlight and read the title of the play about
halfway through, then my laugh would have been a lot bigger when the coach name-checks
his kids as “Wendy, Michael and John.” Like
I say, I could have missed it, or it didn’t register because I was paying more attention
to Amanda Sayle’s detective than I was to anything else. But if it wasn’t spoken, it should have been,
and at least three times. (Rules of Threes: mention it three times and people
remember it.)
The last two pieces, if I
had been scheduling the show, would have been reversed. Thanks For The Bowl With The Soup In It,
Helen! by Nick Jones would have been the perfect closer: an upbeat,
funny, sharply-observed monologue on The Roommate From Hell with a great
performance by Allyson Morgan. Instead,
the final piece was Us: A MEMORY by Janine Nabors, a dark little time-trip through
the good and bad of a couple’s life together which was a deliberately sobering
downer. Me, I would have ended on the
upper.
4/9: Happy Birthday by
Anita Loos
When I saw that Hanna
Cheek was in this, I figured, even if it was bad, I would have a great time
watching her trying to make it good. Plus,
y’know, Karen Ziemba. Not knowing
anything about the play, I figured she was the lead. Having seen the play, I can say with
confidence that (a) she would have played the lead 20 years ago and (b) I still
think she’s in her 30’s. But then I
think the same way about myself, which is why I need all day Saturday now to
recuperate from my Friday nights.
The play is a clever riff
on the old saw that wine reveals the soul as a mirror reveals the person. Helen Hayes did it originally, and it won her
a Tony. Katharine Hepburn was interested
in filming it, but you can see why it didn’t get made: there’s no judgment
about the evils of drinking here, and nobody walks onstage equal-timing alcohol
with sobriety. It’s set in a bar;
everybody drinks. And the only spectre
is the guy who gets so smashed he becomes violent. Which is again, thematic. It’s actually a delightful eveling, brightly played
and smartly directed as both an ensemble piece and a star turn for the lead
part, played with determined glee by Mary Bacon. But as fun as it was to watch her, I couldn’t
help wishing it was 20 years ago and Karen Ziemba was doing it. Or next year and Hanna Cheek was.
4/11: Julius Caesar, Royal
Shapespeare, BAM.
This is miles away from
the stolid sausagefest that is your typical Julius Caesar—continents away,
in fact. Set in modern Africa ,
with a killer set and an opening ten-minute crowd scene that establishes the
energetic and almost celebratory atmosphere that’s maintained throughout the
entire evening, this is by far the most emotionally riveting production of the
play that I’ve ever seen. Everybody’s on
edge. The only way Paterson Joseph’s
Brutus could be described as stoic is if, in this version, the word “stoic” means
“a man who doesn’t spit when he yells.” And
maybe because of this naked openness, the Rome
of this production is filled with nothing but manipulators. Nobody’s honorable—not Brutus, who’s like a
glad-handing quarterback trying to buck up his front line every time one of his
passes falls short—not Ray Fearon’s Mark Anthony, who will promise anybody
anything to get what he wants—and certainly not Cyril Nri’s Cassius, who gets
publicly dissed by Caesar and is a live wire of frustrated action. Another virtue of this production is that it really
makes you feel for Cassius, who’s not as popular as Brutus, and whose advice
(which Brutus never takes) is never wrong.
To continue the football image, Cassius is the sideline coach who keeps
sending in plays, and Brutus is the quarterback who keeps calling
audibles.
I had only one irksome
moment, at the end. When everybody’s
carrying AK-47’s, it seems more than a little incongruous to ask someone to
hold a machete while you run on it. Wouldn’t
it be easier to just put a gun to your head and pull the trigger? Unless of course you’re out of bullets. Which could have been easily indicated, but it
never was. (Consider this a play call
from the booth for future modern dress productions of JC.)
4/12: The Big Knife, by
Clifford Odets
The curtain rose and just
the setting and the placement of the actors made me lean over to my friend
Jessica and whisper: “Oh—right! This is
that Jack Palance movie!” Which is how I know The Big Knife, notable
for being Rod Steiger’s first movie as well as one of the few films where
Palance plays the lead. (Opposite Ida
Lupino, no less. And directed by Robert
Aldrich. So Fifties you could die,
right?)
The theme is one that was
probably devastating in 1949 and looks old hat now: see how Hollywood makes your dreams come false. It gets a little heavy-handed at the end (but
then the big challenge with Odets is fitting the square peg of his Obvious into
the round hole of our Naturalism), and although there are some fine moments,
this production is not really satisfying except as a really solid example of
how raising your voice does not actually raise the stakes. And the stakes are always high in an Odets
play. Plus he writes dialogue like it’s
sweaty poetry. There’s something
vulnerable under the slangish patter; those verbal tics are armor against despair
and failure. Treating his words naturalistically is like deliberately walking
away from the only door that leads you into his characters, and makes you look
like you’re in a different play. Bobby Cannavale
and Marin Ireland
are in that different play. As opposed
to Reg Rogers as Smiley, who is neck-deep in an Odets play—he has it down. So does Chip Zein as Nat Danziger.
Cannavale, alas, does
not—there’s a lot of fuming, but very little struggle, in his performance. He sprawls like a ragdoll on a low chair or
stands dead center with his hands in his pockets—which, for a man who is
supposedly haunted by the past, desperate for the future, and fighting for his
life, is the textbook definition of “uncercutting.” Marin Ireland snaps
into focus now and then, but most of the time she’s an uncertain bystander. Rachel Brosnahan has a self-aware sharpness that’s
totally undercut by a Betty Boop voice that I just started to understand five
lines before her scene ended. And on a
scale of 1 to 10, Richard Kind comes in at 10 and stays there, which is a fine
piece of work until he needs to up the ante and you don’t care a bit because 12
is just 10 with feedback.
Ultimately there’s enough
good in this to make it difficult to say where the dissatisfaction lies—is the
play at fault or is it the production? I’d
go with the production, and Doug Hughes’ direction, if only because the lasting
image I have of the evening is Bobby Cannavale standing there like a lounge
lizard waiting for his next dance partner, instead of pacing like a prisoner in
a cell of his own making. Watching him
made me think of Jack Palance in the movie (which is bad, I know). And once I started thinking about the movie,
I began to imagine what that would have been like with, say, Paul Newman in the
lead. Which is much worse. But it helped pass the time till
the next scene with Smiley Coy, and I was brought back to what was actually
happening onstage.
1 comment:
busy bee
Post a Comment